EGGG101 Intro to
Engineering
(Mechanical Engineering-Dr. Prasad)
Fall 2009
INSTRUCTOR
Ajay K. Prasad
302 Spencer Lab
Office Hours: MW 10 - 11 am
TA’s
Jenn Iskra, Leah Putman, Becky Buxbaum, Peter Bocchini, Bryan Hennigan
Objectives
(General)
- To
introduce Mechanical Engineering to freshmen.
- To
describe the subject areas within Mechanical Engineering.
- To illustrate
the diverse career paths that ME’s can follow.
Objectives
(Specific)
- To use
a wind turbine experiment module to demonstrate the breadth of Mechanical
Engineering
- To
encourage creativity in the use of experimental apparatus and
data-acquisition.
- To
foster self-reliance required for open-ended experiments.
- To
develop the ability for teamwork.
- To
develop effective communication of technical information.
- To
develop computer skills for
data reduction and plotting.
Wind Turbine
Experiment
Students working in teams of 6 will perform a wind turbine
experiment. Each group will acquire one set of data, and each group will submit
a single lab report. Experiments will be performed in Spencer Lab 021 (Groups
A, B, and C) and Spencer Lab 123 (Groups D, E, and F).
Lab Report
Each lab group will turn in a single report for each
experiment. Reports must be typed. Reports should be concise but complete. Use
your own words; verbatim copying of the handout should be avoided. Do not pad
the length of the report unnecessarily.
The report must contain the following sections:
- Title
page
- Title
of experiment
- Section
number; Team ID; Names of group members
- Date
experiment was performed
- Date
report was submitted
- Objectives
- Theoretical
background
- What
principle is this experiment designed to illustrate?
- Describe
the theory and any relevant equations/derivations.
- Equipment
- Describe
all components used during the experiment.
- Include
a neat schematic diagram and/or photograph with all parts labeled and dimensioned
(as required). Copying sections of a report, or sharing sketches with
other groups is not permitted.
- Provide
a definition of all symbols used.
- Procedure
For each objective in a given experiment:
- Initial
setup
- Procedure
- Parameters
varied
- Results
- Raw
data should be arranged in tabular form. Some data may be tabulated in
the Appendix.
- A
completely worked-out sample calculation is required for repetitive
calculations.
- Use
MS Excel (or any other spreadsheet program) for tabulation and plotting
graphs.
- Error
analysis
- What
factors contributed to uncertainty in your results?
- Suggest
ways to reduce error in the final result.
- Discussion
and conclusions
- What
did you learn from this experiment?
- What
discrepancies did you notice between theory and experiment?
- What
would you do to improve it?
- Appendices
Include copies of all notes taken during the experiment: (1) Name of data
recorder, (2) group members present, (3) date, (4) all data recorded,
including brief comments to help you later during data reduction and
analysis. Do not use erasers during note-taking (just draw a line through
your mistake and proceed).
Grading of Reports
Fulfilling basic requirements listed above (neatness and
professionalism is key) will fetch the group an automatic 6 points on a scale
of 10. The remaining points will be awarded on the basis of merit including the
organization of thoughts, illuminating discussion, and excellence of error
analysis.
Lab reports are due no later than one week after performing the experiment.
Late reports will be penalized, 0.5 points for every late day. Lab attendance
is absolutely necessary. 5 points are automatically deducted from your
individual grade you miss a lab session.
A Peer
Evaluation Form will be used to allow students to rank their own
contribution, and that of their fellow team members, to the overall lab effort
and the resulting lab report. Each individual's ranking is averaged, assigned a
numerical value, and used as a multiplier on the team grade, to extract an
individual grade. This mechanism will be used to differentiate and
appropriately reward individual efforts. (You may be interested to know that
companies often use such peer evaluations to calculate annual raises.)