MEEG 481 / MEEG 681
Computer Solution of Engineering Problems
Computer Session 10

Nonlinear Analysis of a 2-D Rubber Seal

In this session we will simulate large deformation (stresses and deflections) of a rubber seal and its contact process with a trunk door when being pushed in. The complex shape of the seal also leads to rubber-rubber surface contact.

The purpose of the analysis is to examine the stresses and deflections created within the rubber
during the closing of a door. The seal is made of a rubber material and therefore is modeled using hyperelestic material properties.  Since the trunk door is much stiffer than rubber seal, the trunk door will be modeled as a rigid body. Additionally, the rubber seal will come in contact with itself.  This contact must be taken
into accout explicitly, otherwise the seal will pass through itself.

New features

Steps in a contact analysis:

The basic steps for performing a typical surface-to-surface contact analysis are listed below:

Designating contact and target surfaces:

Contact emelents are constrained against penetrating the target surface. However, the target elements can penetrate through the contact surface.

For rigid-to-flexible contact, the designation is obvious: the target surface is always the rigid surface and the contact surface is always the deformable surface.

For felxible-to-flexible contact, the guidelines are:

Pre-processing notes:

The ANSYS input file used in Spring 2002.

The model creation consists of six phases.  The ANSYS log files: Seal-MR.part1, Seal-MR.part2, Seal-MR.part3, Seal-MR.part4, are made to give you essentially
step-by-step instructions. The different phases are:

Solution substeps:

 SOLUTION HISTORY INFORMATION FOR JOB: seal.mntr

 ANSYS RELEASE  5.6             .2      17:34:47    04/30/2001

 LOAD SUB-  NO.   NO.  TOTL   INCREMENT    TOTAL       VARIAB 1    VARIAB 2    VARIAB 3
 STEP STEP  ATTMP ITER ITER   TIME/LFACT   TIME/LFACT  MONITOR     MONITOR     MONITOR
                                                       CPU         MxDs        MxPl

   1     1    1     1     1   0.50000E-01 0.50000E-01  19.750     -.35000E-01 0.78886E-30
   1     2    1     1     2   0.50000E-01 0.10000      37.470     -.70000E-01 0.78886E-30
   1     3    1    11    13   0.75000E-01 0.17500      149.45     -.12250     0.78886E-30
   1     4    3     9    42   0.18750E-01 0.19375      430.70     -.13562     0.78886E-30
   1     5    1     3    45   0.18750E-01 0.21250      467.09     -.14875     0.78886E-30
   1     6    1     5    50   0.28125E-01 0.24062      522.28     -.16844     0.78886E-30
   1     7    1     7    57   0.28125E-01 0.26875      596.30     -.18813     0.78886E-30
   1     8    1     8    65   0.28125E-01 0.29688      679.88     -.20781     0.78886E-30
   1     9    1     5    70   0.42188E-01 0.33906      735.54     -.23734     0.78886E-30
   1    10    1     9    79   0.63281E-01 0.40234      832.39     -.28164     0.78886E-30
   1    11    1    11    90   0.63281E-01 0.46563      948.03     -.32594     0.78886E-30
   1    12    1    12   102   0.63281E-01 0.52891      1076.8     -.37023     0.78886E-30
   1    13    1    11   113   0.63281E-01 0.59219      1188.7     -.41453     0.78886E-30
   1    14    1     9   122   0.63281E-01 0.65547      1282.0     -.45883     0.78886E-30
   1    15    1     8   130   0.94922E-01 0.75039      1366.1     -.52527     0.78886E-30
   1    16    1    11   141   0.14238     0.89277      1478.1     -.62494     0.78886E-30
   1    17    2     8   160   0.53613E-01 0.94639      1704.6     -.66651     0.78886E-30
   1    18    1    11   171   0.53613E-01  1.0000      1822.1     -.70925     0.78886E-30
Results: Total push down = (-0.07,-0.7)
At 10% of push down
At 53% of push down
At 75% of push down
At 100% of push down
Reaction force on the Trunk